On 25.03.2013, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote: > On 03/25/2013 05:32:11 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 25.03.2013, at 23:21, Scott Wood wrote: >> > -next? These are bugfixes, at least partially for regressions from 3.8 (that I pointed out before the bugs were merged!), that should go into master. >> > >> > Also, what about: >> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/226227/ >> > >> > You've got all four patches in kvm-ppc-3.9 as of a few weeks ago -- will you be requesting a pull for that soon? >> Sigh. I guess I've screwed up the whole "let's make -next an unusable tree and fix regressions in a separate one" workflow again. Sorry for that. >> Since the patches already trickled into kvm's next branch, all we can do now is to wait for them to come back through stable, right? Marcelo, Gleb? > > Well, you can still submit that kvm-ppc-3.9 pull request. :-) I can, but nobody would pull it, as it'd create ugly merge commits when 3.10 opens and kvm/next and linus/master get merged. IIUC that's exactly what Linus complained about with Avi's old workflow. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
