On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:43:16AM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > >> For TMR issue, since it has nothing to do with APICv, if we really need to handle > > it later, then we may need a separate patch to fix it. But currently, we may > > focused on APICv only. > >> > > What do you mean by "TMR has nothing to do with APICv"? > Just ignore it. I will send out the fixing with APICv patch. > Does this mean we cannot get away with updating TMR like we do now? Because if we can I prefer to not complicate the code further. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
