On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:15:35PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On 03/13/2013 08:26:20 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > >I arbitrarily > >assigned 0x58494353 for KVM_CAP_IRQ_XICS as the args[0] value to > >indicate XICS. > > Why is it called KVM_CAP_<whatever> if it's not a capability? Because it's associated with a capability. I'm not wedded to the name. > >I think it would be better if we don't have to get a > >new capability number assigned every time we want to add a new type of > >interrupt controller. > > How often does it really happen? If a simple enumeration is good > enough for identifying the main IRQ controller device type, it > should be good enough for identifying the vcpu irq arch. Whatever. I really don't care at this point, I'm just getting extremely tired of the bikeshedding. If you don't like it, propose something. Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
