Il 10/03/2013 12:46, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:48:33AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> After receiving an INIT signal (either via the local APIC, or through
>> KVM_SET_MP_STATE), the bootstrap processor should reset immediately
>> and start execution at 0xfffffff0. Also, SIPIs have no effect on the
>> bootstrap processor. However, KVM currently does not differentiate
>> between the BSP and APs.
>>
> Userspace is capable of resetting vcpu by itself, so adding code to
> handle KVM_SET_MP_STATE(INIT) looks unnecessary to me. I think the
> simple patch below (not tested) should handle INIT for in-kernel irq chip
> and userspace does not need special handling for cpu reset. It already
> knows how to reset cpu on system_reset, so reseting only cpus should not
> be different.
At least you'll need the last two hunks, moving the check for
KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED before kvm_vcpu_block, but yes---something
like this could work.
However, it would effectively redefine the meaning of
KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED and KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED, respectively
to KVM_MP_STATE_WAIT_FOR_SIPI and KVM_MP_STATE_RESETTING. I wasn't sure
if this is considered an API change (personally, I would treat it as one).
Paolo
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 02b51dd..6cb3c21 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -731,7 +731,9 @@ static int __apic_accept_irq(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int delivery_mode,
> case APIC_DM_INIT:
> if (!trig_mode || level) {
> result = 1;
> - vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = kvm_vcpu_is_bsp(vcpu) ?
> + KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED :
> + KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> } else {
> --
> Gleb.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
