On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> The logic for calculating the value with which we call kvm_set_cr0/4 was
> broken (will definitely be visible with nested unrestricted guest mode
> support). Also, we performed the check regarding CR0_ALWAYSON too early
> when in guest mode.
>
> What really needs to be done on both CR0 and CR4 is to mask out L1-owned
> bits and merge them in from GUEST_CR0/4. In contrast, arch.cr0/4 and
> arch.cr0/4_guest_owned_bits contain the mangled L0+L1 state and, thus,
> are not suited as input.
>
> For both CRs, we can then apply the check against VMXON_CRx_ALWAYSON and
> refuse the update if it fails. To be fully consistent, we implement this
> check now also for CR4.
>
> Finally, we have to set the shadow to the value L2 wanted to write
> originally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - keep the non-misleading part of the comment in handle_set_cr0
>
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 7cc566b..832b7b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -4605,37 +4605,53 @@ vmx_patch_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned char *hypercall)
> /* called to set cr0 as appropriate for a mov-to-cr0 exit. */
> static int handle_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
> {
> - if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmxon &&
> - ((val & VMXON_CR0_ALWAYSON) != VMXON_CR0_ALWAYSON))
> - return 1;
> -
> if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
> + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
> + unsigned long orig_val = val;
> +
> /*
> * We get here when L2 changed cr0 in a way that did not change
> * any of L1's shadowed bits (see nested_vmx_exit_handled_cr),
> - * but did change L0 shadowed bits. This can currently happen
> - * with the TS bit: L0 may want to leave TS on (for lazy fpu
> - * loading) while pretending to allow the guest to change it.
> + * but did change L0 shadowed bits.
> */
> - if (kvm_set_cr0(vcpu, (val & vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits) |
> - (vcpu->arch.cr0 & ~vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits)))
> + val = (val & ~vmcs12->cr0_guest_host_mask) |
> + (vmcs_read64(GUEST_CR0) & vmcs12->cr0_guest_host_mask);
I think using GUEST_CR0 here is incorrect. It contains combination of bits
set by L2, L1 and L0 and here we need to get only L2/L1 mix which is in
vcpu->arch.cr0 (almost, but good enough for this case). Why vcpu->arch.cr0
contains right L2/L1 mix? Because it was set to vmcs12->guest_cr0 during
L2 #vmentry. While L2 is running three things may happen to CR0:
1. L2 writes to a bit that is not shadowed neither by L1 nor by L0. It
will go strait to GUEST_CR0.
2. L2 writes to a bit shadowed by L1. L1 #vmexit will be emulated. On the
next #vmetry vcpu->arch.cr0 will be set to whatever value L1 calculated.
3. L2 writes to a bit shadowed by L0, but not L1. This is the case we
are handling here. And if we will do it right vcpu->arch.cr0 will be
up-to-date at the end.
The only case when, while this code running, vcpu->arch.cr0 has not
up-to-date value is if 1 happened, but since L2 guest overwriting cr0
here anyway it does not matter what it previously set in GUEST_CR0. The
correct bits are in a new cr0 value provided by val and accessible by
(val & ~vmcs12->cr0_guest_host_mask).
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
