Am 06.03.2013 um 19:46 schrieb Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 6 March 2013 22:31, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 06.03.2013, at 15:11, Gleb Natapov wrote: >>> KVM_INTERRUPT is synchronous. >> >> Ah, I think that's where my thinko is. On PPC, KVM_INTERRUPT is >> asynchronous. > > As an aside, would it be worth moving PPC into line with other > archs by providing and using a KVM_IRQ_LINE for async > interrupts (ie continuing to provide an asynchronous KVM_INTERRUPT > but only as a deprecated backward compatibility thing) ? Since we need to maintain backwards compatibility anyways, I don't think it makes sense and would only clutter the code :) Alex > > -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
