Il 06/03/2013 15:30, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
>>> >> KVM_IRQ_LINE is basically an IOAPIC interrupt line assert. That's
>>> >> fine. That ioctl should get an ioapic device handle to work on.
>> >
>> > It would be a KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR in your case, right?
> No, it would be KVM_IRQ_LINE. It's basically a command ("do this
> interrupt"), not an attribute modification. Unless we want to
> implement the IRQ pin levels on the "IOAPIC" as attributes. Then it'd
> be a SET_DEVICE_ATTR. But that makes edge interrupt injection harder
> / less obvious ;).
Why is it harder? You don't really inject interrupts, you inject
changes of the pin status, don't you?
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
