On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:34:39PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > These exits have no preconditions, and we already process the > corresponding reasons in nested_vmx_exit_handled correctly. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> Applied, thanks. > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > index 7bd9f88..26d47e9 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -2080,6 +2080,7 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void) > CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING | CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING | > CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS | CPU_BASED_MONITOR_EXITING | > CPU_BASED_RDPMC_EXITING | CPU_BASED_RDTSC_EXITING | > + CPU_BASED_PAUSE_EXITING | > CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS; > /* > * We can allow some features even when not supported by the > @@ -2094,7 +2095,8 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void) > nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low, nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high); > nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low = 0; > nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high &= > - SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES; > + SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES | > + SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING; > } > > static inline bool vmx_control_verify(u32 control, u32 low, u32 high) > -- > 1.7.3.4 -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html