Re: [PATCH] KVM: nSVM/nVMX: Implement vmexit on INIT assertion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-02-27 12:20, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:04:50AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Is the nested-related state already saved on AMD, Jörg? If not, adding
>> this one would not make things worse at least. Still, missing user space
>> save/restore already breaks reset, not only migration (dunno if this is
>> better on AMD).
> 
> Not sure if this is what you are asking for, but nested state is at not
> saved/restored for migration or anything. This is a long-standing issue
> which needs to be fixed at some point.

As I suspected. That needs to be solved at some point, but for now it
would not cause any regression to add another unsaved nested-related
state (here: "INIT asserted"). That was my questions.

Thanks,
Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux