On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 04:58:54PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > This is probably a stupid question, but why the > KVM_SET_IRQCHIP/KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING interface is not appropriate for > your purposes? > > x86 sets up a default GSI->IRQCHIP PIN mapping on creation (during > KVM_SET_IRQCHIP), but it can be modified with KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING. So, I see Scott already answered from the point of view of his MPIC emulation stuff, but I'll answer too from the point of view of my XICS emulation code. My understanding, possibly imperfect, is that in a real system the routing of GSIs to IOAPICs would either be hardwired or set up by the BIOS, described in ACPI tables, and not modified by the operating system. Is that correct? So my belief is that the GSI routing is fundamentally distinct from and handled differently from the routing of interrupts to CPUs, which is fully under the control of the OS. In the XICS model we have a set of interrupt sources, each identified by a 24-bit number. Control operations on an interrupt source just identify the source by its number. Thus the interrupt source number is like a GSI, but we don't need to map that to a different space (e.g. IOAPIC identifier and input number) in order to operate on it, we can just operate on it directly. Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
