Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: VMX: Add Posted Interrupt supporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 09:42:14PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > explanation why its believed to be benign (given how the injection
> > return value is interpreted) could also work. Its ugly, though... murphy
> > is around.
> The race above is not benign. It will report interrupt as coalesced
> while in reality it is injected. This may cause to many interrupt to be
> injected. If this happens rare enough ntp may be able to fix time drift
> resulted from this.

OK.

> > OTOH spinlock is not the end of the world, can figure out something later 
> > (we've tried without success so far).
> It serializes all injections into vcpu. I do not believe now that even
> with lock we are safe for the reason I mention above. We can use pir->on
> bit as a lock, but that only emphasise how ridiculous serialization of
> injections becomes.

Please review the 2nd iteration of pseudocode in patchset v4 thread, it
should be good.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux