On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:52:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > Its not a bad idea to have a new KVM_REQ_ bit for PIR processing (just > > as the current patches do). > Without the numbers I do not see why. KVM_REQ_EVENT already means... counting... many things. Its a well defined request, to sync PIR->VIRR, don't see your point about performance. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
