RE: [PATCH 5/8] KVM: PPC: debug stub interface parameter defined

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:agraf@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 5:24 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: Paul Mackerras; kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] KVM: PPC: debug stub interface parameter defined
> 
> 
> On 17.01.2013, at 12:11, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul Mackerras [mailto:paulus@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:53 PM
> >> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> >> Cc: kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; agraf@xxxxxxx;
> >> Bhushan Bharat-
> >> R65777
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] KVM: PPC: debug stub interface parameter
> >> defined
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:54:42PM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> >>> This patch defines the interface parameter for KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
> >>> ioctl support. Follow up patches will use this for setting up
> >>> hardware breakpoints, watchpoints and software breakpoints.
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> >>> index 453a10f..7d5a51c 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> >>> @@ -1483,6 +1483,12 @@ int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg(struct
> >>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
> >>> 	return r;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>> +					 struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	return -EINVAL;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
> >>> kvm_fpu
> >>> *fpu)  {
> >>> 	return -ENOTSUPP;
> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> >>> index 934413c..4c94ca9 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> >>> @@ -532,12 +532,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>> #endif  }
> >>>
> >>> -int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>> -                                        struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
> >>> -{
> >>> -	return -EINVAL;
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>
> >> This will break the build for non-book E machines, since
> >> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug() is referenced from generic code.
> >> You need to add it to arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c as well.
> >
> > right,  I will correct this.
> 
> Would the implementation actually be different on booke vs book3s? My feeling is
> that powerpc.c is actually the right place for this.
> 

I am not sure there will be anything common between book3s and booke. Should we define the cpu specific function something like kvm_ppc_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug() for booke and book3s and call this new defined function from kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug() in powerpc.c ?

Thanks
-Bharat



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux