Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390/kvm fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:51:24AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 29/01/13 22:03, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> 
> >> The question about 1/1. It is CCed to stable, does this mean you want it
> >> to go to 3.8? kvm-next is for 3.9.
> >>
> > On the second thought, if it is not a regression 3.9 is the right place.
> 
> The store status part is broken, but it only has a severe impact in case of 
> a machine check. (The machine check handler revalidates all registers with
> the content of the save area).
> Since machine checks are part of the virtio-ccw code, this can go into 3.9.
> Feel free to remove the CC:stable. 
> 
No reason to drop stable, but 3.8 will have to get the fix through
stable to after it is released.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux