Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: MMU: simplify mmu_set_spte

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/30/2013 05:53 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:55:24AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 01/29/2013 08:21 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 06:05:29PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>> In order to detecting spte remapping, we can simply check whether the
>>>> spte has already been pointing to the pfn even if the spte is not the
>>>> last spte, for middle spte is pointing to the kernel pfn which can not
>>>> be mapped to userspace
>>>
>>> This check is detecting spte overwrite, when a large spte is replaced by 
>>> pointer to spte table.
>>>
>>> Can't see why check for different pfn is safe: only 'int level' can
>>> differ, and pfn be equivalent, for example.
>>
>> The 'u64 *sptep' must on the "int level" we want to set, that means:
>>  page_header(__pa(sptep)).role.level == "int level".
> 
> Right, then stick a comment there noting which cases that condition handles.
> Keep the current comment and add more.
> 

Okay.

>> We discussed this before :), the discussion can be found at:
>> http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=135345057329427&w=2.
> 
> Note http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=135345059929436&w=2, please take into
> account in the future.

Okay, i will make that patch more simpler in the next version.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux