Re: Status of Fault Tolerance feature?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:16:13 +0200
Andres Toomsalu <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> But is there any other projects in (planned) development with the
> same goal(s)?


I haven't heard of any. But then again, a lot of things get developed
in secret and then dumped on the community.


> Im just really puzzled that while QEMU/KVM being kind a
> mature solution already no true fault tolerance/HA solutions exist
> (Im aware about stateless HA solutions with RHCS etc stacks -  but
> its hardly the "true" HA) - and if I get it correctly - no real
> plans/development in that direction also near-term?


Most people that I know that have tried similar solutions on other
products give up on it because the performance is abysmal. It's
generally faster and better tested to do this stuff at the application
layer.


> 
> Kind regards,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux