Re: [PATCH] vhost-net: fall back to vmalloc if high-order allocation fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:45:50AM -0000, David Laight wrote:
> > +	n = kmalloc(sizeof *n, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > +	if (!n)
> > +		n = vmalloc(sizeof *n);
> 
> I'm slightly confused by this construct.
> I thought kmalloc(... GFP_KERNEL) would sleep waiting for
> memory (rather than return NULL).
> 
> I realise that (for multi-page sizes) that kmalloc() and
> vmalloc() both need to find a contiguous block of kernel
> virtual addresses - in different address ranges, and
> that vmalloc() then has to find physical memory pages
> (which will not be contiguous).
> 
> I think this means that kmalloc() is likely to be faster
> (if it doesn't have to sleep), but that vmalloc() is
> allocating from a much larger resource.
> 
> This make me that that large allocations that are not
> temporary should probably be allocated with vmalloc().

vmalloc has some issues for example afaik it's not backed by
a huge page so  I think its use puts more stress on the TLB cache.

> Is there a 'NO_SLEEP' flag to kmalloc()? is that all
> GFP_ATOMIC requests? If so you might try a non-sleeping
> kmalloc() with a vmalloc() if it fails.
> 
> This all looks as though there should be a GFP_NONCONTIG
> flag (or similar) so that kmalloc() can make a decision itself.
> 
> Of at least a wrapper - like the one for free().
> 
> 	David
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux