On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 05:59:14AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 22.01.2013 02:43, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 06:59:27PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> include/sysemu/kvm.h | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h > >> index 6bdd513..22acf91 100644 > >> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h > >> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h > >> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > >> #define KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF 0 > >> #define KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME 0 > >> #define KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI 0 > >> +#define KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE_STABLE_BIT 0 > >> #endif > >> > >> extern int kvm_allowed; > >> -- > >> 1.7.11.7 > >> > > > > ACK > > BTW is it the general strategy to add these as needed for new patches? > Or should we add all current ones and mandate adding such dummy > definitions when new ones get introduced via linux-headers/ update? Its a good idea to update the sync scripts to automatically create the dummy ones, i suppose (there is no proactive strategy). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
