RE: Guest performance is reduced after live migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I used lmbench, and even simple test shows the difference here.  Simple read/writes (but not open/close?) seem to take much longer.  Perhaps this over simplifies things, but it's repeatable.   Any thoughts?  Other tests that might be interesting? 

ubuntu-12.04 - first boot
==========================================
Simple syscall: 0.0527 microseconds
Simple read: 0.1143 microseconds
Simple write: 0.0953 microseconds
Simple open/close: 1.0432 microseconds

ubuntu-12.04 - post live migration
==========================================
Simple syscall: 0.0621 microseconds
Simple read: 0.2485 microseconds
Simple write: 0.2252 microseconds
Simple open/close: 1.4626 microseconds

ubuntu-10.04 - first boot
==========================================
Simple syscall: 0.0524 microseconds
Simple read: 0.1135 microseconds
Simple write: 0.0972 microseconds
Simple open/close: 1.1261 microseconds


ubuntu-10.04 - post live migration
==========================================
Simple syscall: 0.0526 microseconds
Simple read: 0.1075 microseconds
Simple write: 0.0951 microseconds
Simple open/close: 1.0413 microseconds



Regards,
mark

> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:43:37AM +0000, Mark Petersen wrote:
> > Hello KVM,
> > 
> > I'm seeing something similar to this (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/100592) as well when doing live migrations on Ubuntu 12.04 (Host and Guest) with a backported libvirt 1.0 and qemu-kvm 1.2 (improved performance for live migrations on guests with large memory guests is great!)  The default libvirt  0.9.8 and qemu-kvm 1.0 have the same issue.
> > 
> > Kernel is 3.2.0-34-generic and eglicb 2.15 on both host/guest.  I'm seeing similar issues with both virtio and ide bus.  Hugetblfs is not used, but transparent hugepages are.  Host machines are dual core Xeon E5-2660 processors.  I tried disabling EPT but that doesn't seem to make a difference so I don't think it's a requirement to reproduce.
> > 
> > If I use Ubuntu 10.04 guest with eglibc 2.11 and any of these kernels I don't seem to have the issue:
> > 
> > linux-image-2.6.32-32-server - 2.6.32-32.62 
> > linux-image-2.6.32-38-server - 2.6.32-38.83 
> > linux-image-2.6.32-43-server - 2.6.32-43.97 
> > linux-image-2.6.35-32-server - 2.6.35-32.68~lucid1 
> > linux-image-2.6.38-16-server - 2.6.38-16.67~lucid1 
> > linux-image-3.0.0-26-server  - 3.0.0-26.43~lucid1
> > linux-image-3.2-5 - mainline 3.2.5 kernel

______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux