On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:38:34PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> The following series implements KVM support for ARM processors, >> specifically on the Cortex-A15 platform. > > [...] > > This is looking pretty good to me now and I feel that the longer it stays > out-of-tree, the more issues will creep in (without continual effort from > yourself and others). I've sent some minor comments (mainly vgic-related) > so, if you fix those, then you can add: > > Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > > for the series. A big thanks! > > Now, there's a lot of code here and merging isn't completely > straightforward. I propose: > > * The first series should go via Russell's tree. It depends on my > perf branch for the CPU type stuff, but that should go in for 3.9 > anyway (also via Russell). > Great. > * The vGIC patches need rebasing on top of Rob Herring's work, which > he sent a pull for over the weekend: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-January/141488.html > > In light of that, this stuff will need to go via arm-soc. > > * The hyp arch-timers are in a similar situation to the vGIC: Mark Rutland > is moving those into drivers: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-January/140560.html > > so the kvm bits will need rebasing appropriately and also sent to > arm-soc (Mark -- I assume you intend to send a PULL for 3.9 for those > patches?) > > Obviously this is all open for discussion, but that seems like the easiest > option to me. > Makes good sense. Given that there are no other major disputes over the code we are a couple of people strongly hoping that this can happen for 3.9. In any case, I'll do whatever makes the process the easiest for you guys. Best, -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
