[PATCH qom-cpu 05/11] target-i386: check/enforce: Fix CPUID leaf numbers on error messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The -cpu check/enforce warnings are printing incorrect information about the
missing flags. There are no feature flags on CPUID leaves 0 and 0x80000000, but
there were references to 0 and 0x80000000 in the table at
kvm_check_features_against_host().

This changes the model_features_t struct to contain the register number as
well, so the error messages print the correct CPUID leaf+register information,
instead of wrong CPUID leaf numbers.

This also changes the format of the error messages, so they follow the
"CPUID.<leaf>.<register>.<name> [bit <offset>]" convention used on Intel
documentation. Example output:

    $ qemu-system-x86_64 -machine pc-1.0,accel=kvm -cpu Opteron_G4,+ia64,enforce
    warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:EDX.ia64 [bit 30]
    warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.xsave [bit 26]
    warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.avx [bit 28]
    warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.80000001H:ECX.abm [bit 5]
    warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.80000001H:ECX.sse4a [bit 6]
    warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.80000001H:ECX.misalignsse [bit 7]
    warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.80000001H:ECX.3dnowprefetch [bit 8]
    warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.80000001H:ECX.xop [bit 11]
    warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.80000001H:ECX.fma4 [bit 16]
    Unable to find x86 CPU definition
    $

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Changes v2:
 - Coding style fixes
 - Add assert() for invalid register numbers on
   unavailable_host_feature()
---
 target-i386/cpu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 target-i386/cpu.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
index e916ae0..c3e5db8 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
@@ -124,6 +124,25 @@ static const char *cpuid_7_0_ebx_feature_name[] = {
     NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
 };
 
+const char *get_register_name_32(unsigned int reg)
+{
+    static const char *reg_names[CPU_NB_REGS32] = {
+        [R_EAX] = "EAX",
+        [R_ECX] = "ECX",
+        [R_EDX] = "EDX",
+        [R_EBX] = "EBX",
+        [R_ESP] = "ESP",
+        [R_EBP] = "EBP",
+        [R_ESI] = "ESI",
+        [R_EDI] = "EDI",
+    };
+
+    if (reg > CPU_NB_REGS32) {
+        return NULL;
+    }
+    return reg_names[reg];
+}
+
 /* collects per-function cpuid data
  */
 typedef struct model_features_t {
@@ -132,7 +151,8 @@ typedef struct model_features_t {
     uint32_t check_feat;
     const char **flag_names;
     uint32_t cpuid;
-    } model_features_t;
+    int reg;
+} model_features_t;
 
 int check_cpuid = 0;
 int enforce_cpuid = 0;
@@ -923,10 +943,13 @@ static int unavailable_host_feature(struct model_features_t *f, uint32_t mask)
 
     for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i)
         if (1 << i & mask) {
-            fprintf(stderr, "warning: host cpuid %04x_%04x lacks requested"
-                " flag '%s' [0x%08x]\n",
-                f->cpuid >> 16, f->cpuid & 0xffff,
-                f->flag_names[i] ? f->flag_names[i] : "[reserved]", mask);
+            const char *reg = get_register_name_32(f->reg);
+            assert(reg);
+            fprintf(stderr, "warning: host doesn't support requested feature: "
+                "CPUID.%02XH:%s%s%s [bit %d]\n",
+                f->cpuid, reg,
+                f->flag_names[i] ? "." : "",
+                f->flag_names[i] ? f->flag_names[i] : "", i);
             break;
         }
     return 0;
@@ -945,13 +968,14 @@ static int kvm_check_features_against_host(x86_def_t *guest_def)
     int rv, i;
     struct model_features_t ft[] = {
         {&guest_def->features, &host_def.features,
-            ~0, feature_name, 0x00000000},
+            ~0, feature_name, 0x00000001, R_EDX},
         {&guest_def->ext_features, &host_def.ext_features,
-            ~CPUID_EXT_HYPERVISOR, ext_feature_name, 0x00000001},
+            ~CPUID_EXT_HYPERVISOR, ext_feature_name, 0x00000001, R_ECX},
         {&guest_def->ext2_features, &host_def.ext2_features,
-            ~PPRO_FEATURES, ext2_feature_name, 0x80000000},
+            ~PPRO_FEATURES, ext2_feature_name, 0x80000001, R_EDX},
         {&guest_def->ext3_features, &host_def.ext3_features,
-            ~CPUID_EXT3_SVM, ext3_feature_name, 0x80000001}};
+            ~CPUID_EXT3_SVM, ext3_feature_name, 0x80000001, R_ECX}
+    };
 
     assert(kvm_enabled());
 
diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h
index 27c8d0c..ab81a5c 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.h
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.h
@@ -1221,4 +1221,7 @@ void cpu_report_tpr_access(CPUX86State *env, TPRAccess access);
 void enable_kvm_pv_eoi(void);
 void disable_kvm_mmu_op(void);
 
+/* Return name of 32-bit register, from a R_* constant */
+const char *get_register_name_32(unsigned int reg);
+
 #endif /* CPU_I386_H */
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux