On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 06:34:37AM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote on 2012-12-27:
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 03:32:47AM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >> Marcelo Tosatti wrote on 2012-12-21:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:30:49PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
> >>>> From: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> @@ -3925,6 +3942,15 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx
> > *vmx)
> >>>> vmx_secondary_exec_control(vmx));
> >>>> }
> >>>> + if (enable_apicv_reg_vid) {
> >>>> + vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP0, 0);
> >>>> + vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP1, 0);
> >>>> + vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP2, 0);
> >>>> + vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP3, 0);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + vmcs_write16(GUEST_INTR_STATUS, 0);
> >>>> + }
> >>>
> >>> AFAICS SVI should be regenerated on migration. Consider:
> >>>
> >>> 1. vintr delivery, sets SVI = vector = RVI.
> >>> 2. clears RVI.
> >>> 3. migration.
> >>> 4. RVI properly set from VIRR on entry.
> >>> 5. SVI = 0.
> >>> 6. EOI -> EOI virtualization with SVI = 0.
> >>>
> >>> Could hook into kvm_apic_post_state_restore() to do that (set highest
> >>> index of bit set in VISR).
> >> Ok. How about to make a request(KVM_REQ_UPDATE_SVI) and handle it in
> >> vmentry to set highest index of bit in VISR to RVI.
> >>
> > Just do it in kvm_apic_post_state_restore() directly, no need to do
> > a request.
> What you mean "do it directly". Since we are not in target vcpu's context, we cannot access vmcs at this point. We still need a request or variable to indicate the migration happened.
>
We are in a target vcpu context.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
