Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: x86 emulator: framework for streamlining arithmetic opcodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 07:42:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 02:26:51PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> >> +
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * fastop functions have a special calling convention:
>> >> + *
>> >> + * dst:    [rdx]:rax  (in/out)
>> > May be I miss something obvious but I do not see why rdx is here.
>>
>> MUL, DIV, CWD, etc.
> Yes, but my question was more about actual fastop() implementation
> which does not seams to handle rdx at all.


It will be added later.  If you like, I can remove it from the comment for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux