Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: Don't free ida when disk is in use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20.12.2012, at 11:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:40:15PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> When a file system is mounted on a virtio-blk disk, we then remove it
>> and then reattach it, the reattached disk gets the same disk name and
>> ids as the hot removed one.
>> 
>> This leads to very nasty effects - mostly rendering the newly attached
>> device completely unusable.
>> 
>> Trying what happens when I do the same thing with a USB device, I saw
>> that the sd node simply doesn't get free'd when a device gets forcefully
>> removed.
>> 
>> Imitate the same behavior for vd devices. This way broken vd devices
>> simply are never free'd and newly attached ones keep working just fine.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>> index 0bdde8f..07a18e2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>> @@ -889,6 +889,7 @@ static void __devexit virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>> {
>> 	struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv;
>> 	int index = vblk->index;
>> +	int refc;
>> 
>> 	/* Prevent config work handler from accessing the device. */
>> 	mutex_lock(&vblk->config_lock);
>> @@ -903,11 +904,15 @@ static void __devexit virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>> 
>> 	flush_work(&vblk->config_work);
>> 
>> +	refc = atomic_read(&disk_to_dev(vblk->disk)->kobj.kref.refcount);
>> 	put_disk(vblk->disk);
>> 	mempool_destroy(vblk->pool);
>> 	vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
>> 	kfree(vblk);
>> -	ida_simple_remove(&vd_index_ida, index);
>> +
>> +	/* Only free device id if we don't have any users */
>> +	if (refc == 1)
>> +		ida_simple_remove(&vd_index_ida, index);
>> }
>> 
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> 
> Network devices take the approach of retrying every second.
> Donnu if it makes sense here.

I would rather think the 100% right approach would be a recursive unrolling of all users bottom to top. Force unmount. Force close all fd's. I'm not sure why that doesn't happen today, but it doesn't :).


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux