> -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:06 AM > To: Hao, Xudong > Cc: qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx; gleb@xxxxxxxxxx; > kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm/pci-assign: 64 bits bar emulation > > On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:47 +0800, Xudong Hao wrote: > > Enable 64 bits bar emulation. > > > > v2 changes from v1: > > - Change 0lx% to 0x%016 when print a 64 bit variable. > > > > Test pass with the current seabios which already support 64bit pci bars. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > hw/kvm/pci-assign.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- > > 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c > > index 7a0998c..fb58ca9 100644 > > --- a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c > > +++ b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ > > #define IORESOURCE_IRQ 0x00000400 > > #define IORESOURCE_DMA 0x00000800 > > #define IORESOURCE_PREFETCH 0x00002000 /* No side effects */ > > +#define IORESOURCE_MEM_64 0x00100000 > > > > //#define DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT_DEBUG > > > > @@ -442,9 +443,13 @@ static int assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion > *io_regions, > > > > /* handle memory io regions */ > > if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM) { > > - int t = cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH > > - ? PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH > > - : PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY; > > + int t = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY; > > + if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) { > > + t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH; > > + } > > + if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) { > > + t |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64; > > + } > > > > /* map physical memory */ > > pci_dev->v_addrs[i].u.r_virtbase = mmap(NULL, > cur_region->size, > > @@ -468,10 +473,10 @@ static int > assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion *io_regions, > > (cur_region->base_addr & 0xFFF); > > > > if (cur_region->size & 0xFFF) { > > - error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%" PRIx64 " > has " > > - "size 0x%" PRIx64 ", which is not a > multiple of " > > - "4K. You might experience some > performance hit " > > - "due to that.", > > + error_report("PCI region %d at address 0x%016" PRIx64 > " has " > > + "size 0x%016" PRIx64 ", which is not a > multiple " > > + "of 4K. You might experience some > performance " > > + "hit due to that.", > > nit, these changes to %016 don't make sense. If the size is not a > multiple of 4k, then it's less than 4k, so adding leading zeros is just > a waste. Also, are BARs that small likely to be 64bit? Seems like not, > so more unnecessary zeros. Thanks, > Alex, You're right for this error_report print less than 4k. So your comments is removing 016 and just remain the original code is fine, right? ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
