On 10.12.2012, at 11:16, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:54:45 +0100 > Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Missing patch description. Otherwise: > > "Add base infrastructure for enabling capabilities" would be redundant, > no? Well, whoever pulls this gets to say what style he likes. I simply heads-on reject every patch that doesn't contain a patch description, but only a subject line :). Others are a lot more relaxed about this. And yes, it'd be redundant, but easier readable imho. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
