On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:09:39 -0700 Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 23:02 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:21:26 -0700 > > Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > With the 3 private slots, this gives us a nice round 128 slots total. > > > > So I think this patch needs to be applied after resolving the > > slot_bitmap issue. We may not need to protect slots with large > > slot id values, but still it's possible to do so. > > > > Taking into account that the merge window is so close that this > > patch set should be targeted for 3.9, it may be possible to do > > the work timely: I will post my patch series next week if possible. > > This obviously increases the slot_bitmap, actually only doubles it since > it's an unsigned long and we're only using 36 bits, but why should > removing the slot_bitmap gate this series? Thanks, I was wrong, sorry. I thought slot_bitmap was defined as u64 or something, the fact was that my memory was corrupt. Thanks, Takuya -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
