On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 19:22 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:39:24PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: > > This allows us to resize this structure and therefore the number of > > memslots as part of the RCU update. > > Why is this necessary? "struct memslots" is updated, message above > conflicts with that. > > If there is a reason, "id_to_index" becomes confusing. > I can't have two indeterminate sized arrays in the same structure, so by moving id_to_index into struct kvm_memory_slot I get back to one array. I'm playing with whether this is worthwhile. If we reduce id_to_index to a short then we can leave it with a static size and still get a memory savings for the typical case. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
