On 28/11/12 13:21, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:44:58PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add the GIC distributor emulation code. A number of the GIC features
>> are simply ignored as they are not required to boot a Linux guest.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_vgic.h | 167 ++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c | 471 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 637 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_vgic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_vgic.h
>> index 9ca8d21..9e60b1d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_vgic.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_vgic.h
>> @@ -19,10 +19,177 @@
>> #ifndef __ASM_ARM_KVM_VGIC_H
>> #define __ASM_ARM_KVM_VGIC_H
>>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
>> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> +#include <linux/irqreturn.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +#define VGIC_NR_IRQS 128
>
> #define VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS 32?
>
>> +#define VGIC_NR_SHARED_IRQS (VGIC_NR_IRQS - 32)
>
> then subtract it here
Sure.
>> +#define VGIC_MAX_CPUS NR_CPUS
>
> We already have KVM_MAX_VCPUS, why do we need another?
They really should be the same, and this NR_CPUS is a bug that has
already been fixed.
>> +
>> +/* Sanity checks... */
>> +#if (VGIC_MAX_CPUS > 8)
>> +#error Invalid number of CPU interfaces
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#if (VGIC_NR_IRQS & 31)
>> +#error "VGIC_NR_IRQS must be a multiple of 32"
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#if (VGIC_NR_IRQS > 1024)
>> +#error "VGIC_NR_IRQS must be <= 1024"
>> +#endif
>
> Maybe put each check directly below the #define being tested, to make it
> super-obvious to people thinking of changing the constants?
OK.
>> +/*
>> + * The GIC distributor registers describing interrupts have two parts:
>> + * - 32 per-CPU interrupts (SGI + PPI)
>> + * - a bunch of shared interrups (SPI)
>
> interrupts
>
>> + */
>> +struct vgic_bitmap {
>> + union {
>> + u32 reg[1];
>> + unsigned long reg_ul[0];
>> + } percpu[VGIC_MAX_CPUS];
>> + union {
>> + u32 reg[VGIC_NR_SHARED_IRQS / 32];
>> + unsigned long reg_ul[0];
>> + } shared;
>> +};
>
> Whoa, this is nasty!
>
> Firstly, let's replace the `32' with sizeof(u32) for fun. Secondly, can
> we make the reg_ul arrays sized using the BITS_TO_LONGS macro?
This has already been replaced with:
struct vgic_bitmap {
union {
u32 reg[1];
DECLARE_BITMAP(reg_ul, 32);
} percpu[VGIC_MAX_CPUS];
union {
u32 reg[VGIC_NR_SHARED_IRQS / 32];
DECLARE_BITMAP(reg_ul, VGIC_NR_SHARED_IRQS);
} shared;
};
which should address most of your concerns. As for the sizeof(u32), I
think assuming that u32 has a grand total of 32bits is safe enough ;-)
>> +
>> +static inline u32 *vgic_bitmap_get_reg(struct vgic_bitmap *x,
>> + int cpuid, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + offset >>= 2;
>> + BUG_ON(offset > (VGIC_NR_IRQS / 32));
>
> Hmm, where is offset sanity-checked before here? Do you just rely on all
> trapped accesses being valid?
You've already validated the access being in a valid range. Offset is
just derived the access address. the BUG_ON() is a leftover from early
debugging and should go away now.
>> + if (!offset)
>> + return x->percpu[cpuid].reg;
>> + else
>> + return x->shared.reg + offset - 1;
>
> An alternative to this would be to have a single array, with the per-cpu
> interrupts all laid out at the start and a macro to convert an offset to
> an index. Might make the code more readable and the struct definition more
> concise.
I'll try and see if this makes the code more palatable.
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vgic_bitmap_get_irq_val(struct vgic_bitmap *x,
>> + int cpuid, int irq)
>> +{
>> + if (irq < 32)
>
> VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS (inless you go with the suggestion above)
yep.
>> + return test_bit(irq, x->percpu[cpuid].reg_ul);
>> +
>> + return test_bit(irq - 32, x->shared.reg_ul);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void vgic_bitmap_set_irq_val(struct vgic_bitmap *x,
>> + int cpuid, int irq, int val)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long *reg;
>> +
>> + if (irq < 32)
>> + reg = x->percpu[cpuid].reg_ul;
>> + else {
>> + reg = x->shared.reg_ul;
>> + irq -= 32;
>> + }
>
> Likewise.
>
>> +
>> + if (val)
>> + set_bit(irq, reg);
>> + else
>> + clear_bit(irq, reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long *vgic_bitmap_get_cpu_map(struct vgic_bitmap *x,
>> + int cpuid)
>> +{
>> + if (unlikely(cpuid >= VGIC_MAX_CPUS))
>> + return NULL;
>> + return x->percpu[cpuid].reg_ul;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long *vgic_bitmap_get_shared_map(struct vgic_bitmap *x)
>> +{
>> + return x->shared.reg_ul;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct vgic_bytemap {
>> + union {
>> + u32 reg[8];
>> + unsigned long reg_ul[0];
>> + } percpu[VGIC_MAX_CPUS];
>> + union {
>> + u32 reg[VGIC_NR_SHARED_IRQS / 4];
>> + unsigned long reg_ul[0];
>> + } shared;
>> +};
>
> Argh, it's another one! :)
Rest assured it is the last one, and it doesn't get much use either. ;-)
>> +
>> +static inline u32 *vgic_bytemap_get_reg(struct vgic_bytemap *x,
>> + int cpuid, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + offset >>= 2;
>> + BUG_ON(offset > (VGIC_NR_IRQS / 4));
>> + if (offset < 4)
>> + return x->percpu[cpuid].reg + offset;
>> + else
>> + return x->shared.reg + offset - 8;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vgic_bytemap_get_irq_val(struct vgic_bytemap *x,
>> + int cpuid, int irq)
>> +{
>> + u32 *reg, shift;
>> + shift = (irq & 3) * 8;
>> + reg = vgic_bytemap_get_reg(x, cpuid, irq);
>> + return (*reg >> shift) & 0xff;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void vgic_bytemap_set_irq_val(struct vgic_bytemap *x,
>> + int cpuid, int irq, int val)
>> +{
>> + u32 *reg, shift;
>> + shift = (irq & 3) * 8;
>> + reg = vgic_bytemap_get_reg(x, cpuid, irq);
>> + *reg &= ~(0xff << shift);
>> + *reg |= (val & 0xff) << shift;
>> +}
>> +
>> struct vgic_dist {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC
>> + spinlock_t lock;
>> +
>> + /* Virtual control interface mapping */
>> + void __iomem *vctrl_base;
>> +
>> /* Distributor and vcpu interface mapping in the guest */
>> phys_addr_t vgic_dist_base;
>> phys_addr_t vgic_cpu_base;
>> +
>> + /* Distributor enabled */
>> + u32 enabled;
>> +
>> + /* Interrupt enabled (one bit per IRQ) */
>> + struct vgic_bitmap irq_enabled;
>> +
>> + /* Interrupt 'pin' level */
>> + struct vgic_bitmap irq_state;
>> +
>> + /* Level-triggered interrupt in progress */
>> + struct vgic_bitmap irq_active;
>> +
>> + /* Interrupt priority. Not used yet. */
>> + struct vgic_bytemap irq_priority;
>
> What would the bitmap component of the bytemap represent for priorities?
Exactly nothing. These fields will die a horrible death in a few seconds ;-)
>> +
>> + /* Level/edge triggered */
>> + struct vgic_bitmap irq_cfg;
>> +
>> + /* Source CPU per SGI and target CPU */
>> + u8 irq_sgi_sources[VGIC_MAX_CPUS][16];
>
> Ah, I guess my VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS interrupt should be further divided...
Could do indeed.
>> + /* Target CPU for each IRQ */
>> + u8 irq_spi_cpu[VGIC_NR_SHARED_IRQS];
>> + struct vgic_bitmap irq_spi_target[VGIC_MAX_CPUS];
>> +
>> + /* Bitmap indicating which CPU has something pending */
>> + unsigned long irq_pending_on_cpu;
>> +#endif
>> };
>>
>> struct vgic_cpu {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c b/arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c
>> index f85b275..82feee8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/vgic.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,42 @@
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>>
>> +/*
>> + * How the whole thing works (courtesy of Christoffer Dall):
>> + *
>> + * - At any time, the dist->irq_pending_on_cpu is the oracle that knows if
>> + * something is pending
>> + * - VGIC pending interrupts are stored on the vgic.irq_state vgic
>> + * bitmap (this bitmap is updated by both user land ioctls and guest
>> + * mmio ops) and indicate the 'wire' state.
>> + * - Every time the bitmap changes, the irq_pending_on_cpu oracle is
>> + * recalculated
>> + * - To calculate the oracle, we need info for each cpu from
>> + * compute_pending_for_cpu, which considers:
>> + * - PPI: dist->irq_state & dist->irq_enable
>> + * - SPI: dist->irq_state & dist->irq_enable & dist->irq_spi_target
>> + * - irq_spi_target is a 'formatted' version of the GICD_ICFGR
>> + * registers, stored on each vcpu. We only keep one bit of
>> + * information per interrupt, making sure that only one vcpu can
>> + * accept the interrupt.
>> + * - The same is true when injecting an interrupt, except that we only
>> + * consider a single interrupt at a time. The irq_spi_cpu array
>> + * contains the target CPU for each SPI.
>> + *
>> + * The handling of level interrupts adds some extra complexity. We
>> + * need to track when the interrupt has been EOIed, so we can sample
>> + * the 'line' again. This is achieved as such:
>> + *
>> + * - When a level interrupt is moved onto a vcpu, the corresponding
>> + * bit in irq_active is set. As long as this bit is set, the line
>> + * will be ignored for further interrupts. The interrupt is injected
>> + * into the vcpu with the VGIC_LR_EOI bit set (generate a
>> + * maintenance interrupt on EOI).
>> + * - When the interrupt is EOIed, the maintenance interrupt fires,
>> + * and clears the corresponding bit in irq_active. This allow the
>> + * interrupt line to be sampled again.
>> + */
>> +
>> #define VGIC_ADDR_UNDEF (-1)
>> #define IS_VGIC_ADDR_UNDEF(_x) ((_x) == (typeof(_x))VGIC_ADDR_UNDEF)
>>
>> @@ -38,6 +74,14 @@
>> #define ACCESS_WRITE_VALUE (3 << 1)
>> #define ACCESS_WRITE_MASK(x) ((x) & (3 << 1))
>>
>> +static void vgic_update_state(struct kvm *kvm);
>> +static void vgic_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 reg);
>> +
>> +static inline int vgic_irq_is_edge(struct vgic_dist *dist, int irq)
>> +{
>> + return vgic_bitmap_get_irq_val(&dist->irq_cfg, 0, irq);
>> +}
>
> so vgic_bitmap_get_irq_val returns 0 for level and anything else for edge?
> Maybe an enum or something could make this clearer? Also, why not take a vcpu
> or cpuid parameter to pass through, rather than assuming 0?
Fair enough.
>> +
>> /**
>> * vgic_reg_access - access vgic register
>> * @mmio: pointer to the data describing the mmio access
>> @@ -101,6 +145,280 @@ static void vgic_reg_access(struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 *reg,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static bool handle_mmio_misc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 reg;
>> + u32 u32off = offset & 3;
>
> u32off? Bitten by a regex perhaps?
No. It used to be "off", which described the offset in a u32. People
complained about the lack of clarity, hence the u32off. word_offset, maybe?
>> +
>> + switch (offset & ~3) {
>> + case 0: /* CTLR */
>> + reg = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.enabled;
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, ®, u32off,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_VALUE);
>> + if (mmio->is_write) {
>> + vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.enabled = reg & 1;
>> + vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case 4: /* TYPER */
>> + reg = (atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->online_vcpus) - 1) << 5;
>> + reg |= (VGIC_NR_IRQS >> 5) - 1;
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, ®, u32off,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_IGNORED);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case 8: /* IIDR */
>> + reg = 0x4B00043B;
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, ®, u32off,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_IGNORED);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool handle_mmio_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, NULL, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_RAZ | ACCESS_WRITE_IGNORED);
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool handle_mmio_set_enable_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 *reg = vgic_bitmap_get_reg(&vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.irq_enabled,
>> + vcpu->vcpu_id, offset);
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, reg, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_SETBIT);
>> + if (mmio->is_write) {
>> + vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool handle_mmio_clear_enable_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 *reg = vgic_bitmap_get_reg(&vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.irq_enabled,
>> + vcpu->vcpu_id, offset);
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, reg, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_CLEARBIT);
>> + if (mmio->is_write) {
>> + if (offset < 4) /* Force SGI enabled */
>> + *reg |= 0xffff;
>> + vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool handle_mmio_set_pending_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 *reg = vgic_bitmap_get_reg(&vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.irq_state,
>> + vcpu->vcpu_id, offset);
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, reg, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_SETBIT);
>> + if (mmio->is_write) {
>> + vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool handle_mmio_clear_pending_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 *reg = vgic_bitmap_get_reg(&vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.irq_state,
>> + vcpu->vcpu_id, offset);
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, reg, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_CLEARBIT);
>> + if (mmio->is_write) {
>> + vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool handle_mmio_priority_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 *reg = vgic_bytemap_get_reg(&vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.irq_priority,
>> + vcpu->vcpu_id, offset);
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, reg, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_VALUE);
>> + return false;
>> +}
>
> What do you gain from returning a bool from the MMIO handlers? Why not assume
> that state has always been updated and kick the vcpus if something is pending?
Computing the state for the whole distributor is quite expensive (we
used to compute it all at each interrupt injection, and switching to
single-nit operations have a measurable difference).
>> +
>> +static u32 vgic_get_target_reg(struct kvm *kvm, int irq)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> + int i, c;
>> + unsigned long *bmap;
>> + u32 val = 0;
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(irq & 3);
>> + BUG_ON(irq < 32);
>
> Again, these look scary because I can't see the offset sanity checking for
> the MMIO traps...
Range checking again.
>> +
>> + irq -= 32;
>> +
>> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, vcpu, kvm) {
>> + bmap = vgic_bitmap_get_shared_map(&dist->irq_spi_target[c]);
>> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
>
> Is that 4 from sizeof(unsigned long)?
>From the definition of the target registers, actually (4 bytes per
register, one byte per interrupt, one CPU per bit).
>
>> + if (test_bit(irq + i, bmap))
>> + val |= 1 << (c + i * 8);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vgic_set_target_reg(struct kvm *kvm, u32 val, int irq)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> + int i, c;
>> + unsigned long *bmap;
>> + u32 target;
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(irq & 3);
>> + BUG_ON(irq < 32);
>> +
>> + irq -= 32;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Pick the LSB in each byte. This ensures we target exactly
>> + * one vcpu per IRQ. If the byte is null, assume we target
>> + * CPU0.
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>> + int shift = i * 8;
>
> Is this from BITS_PER_BYTE?
Good point.
>> + target = ffs((val >> shift) & 0xffU);
>> + target = target ? (target - 1) : 0;
>
> __ffs?
Does this look better?
target = (val >> shift) & 0xffU;
if (target)
target = __ffs(target);
>
>> + dist->irq_spi_cpu[irq + i] = target;
>> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, vcpu, kvm) {
>> + bmap = vgic_bitmap_get_shared_map(&dist->irq_spi_target[c]);
>> + if (c == target)
>> + set_bit(irq + i, bmap);
>> + else
>> + clear_bit(irq + i, bmap);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool handle_mmio_target_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 reg;
>> +
>> + /* We treat the banked interrupts targets as read-only */
>> + if (offset < 32) {
>> + u32 roreg = 1 << vcpu->vcpu_id;
>> + roreg |= roreg << 8;
>> + roreg |= roreg << 16;
>> +
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, &roreg, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_IGNORED);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + reg = vgic_get_target_reg(vcpu->kvm, offset & ~3U);
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, ®, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_VALUE);
>> + if (mmio->is_write) {
>> + vgic_set_target_reg(vcpu->kvm, reg, offset & ~3U);
>> + vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 vgic_cfg_expand(u16 val)
>> +{
>> + u32 res = 0;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
>> + res |= (val >> i) << (2 * i + 1);
>
> Ok, you've lost me on this one but replacing some of the magic numbers with
> the constants they represent would be much appreciated, please!
The comment below contains some explanation (but the code is buggy and
has been fixed already). I'll try to come up with some detailed
explanation about what this code is trying to do.
>> +
>> + return res;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u16 vgic_cfg_compress(u32 val)
>> +{
>> + u16 res = 0;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
>> + res |= (val >> (i * 2 + 1)) << i;
>> +
>> + return res;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The distributor uses 2 bits per IRQ for the CFG register, but the
>> + * LSB is always 0. As such, we only keep the upper bit, and use the
>> + * two above functions to compress/expand the bits
>> + */
>> +static bool handle_mmio_cfg_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 val;
>> + u32 *reg = vgic_bitmap_get_reg(&vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.irq_cfg,
>> + vcpu->vcpu_id, offset >> 1);
>> + if (offset & 2)
>> + val = *reg >> 16;
>> + else
>> + val = *reg & 0xffff;
>> +
>> + val = vgic_cfg_expand(val);
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, &val, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_VALUE | ACCESS_WRITE_VALUE);
>> + if (mmio->is_write) {
>> + if (offset < 4) {
>> + *reg = ~0U; /* Force PPIs/SGIs to 1 */
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + val = vgic_cfg_compress(val);
>> + if (offset & 2) {
>> + *reg &= 0xffff;
>> + *reg |= val << 16;
>> + } else {
>> + *reg &= 0xffff << 16;
>> + *reg |= val;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool handle_mmio_sgi_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 reg;
>> + vgic_reg_access(mmio, ®, offset,
>> + ACCESS_READ_RAZ | ACCESS_WRITE_VALUE);
>> + if (mmio->is_write) {
>> + vgic_dispatch_sgi(vcpu, reg);
>> + vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* All this should be handled by kvm_bus_io_*()... FIXME!!! */
>> struct mmio_range {
>> unsigned long base;
>> @@ -110,6 +428,66 @@ struct mmio_range {
>> };
>>
>> static const struct mmio_range vgic_ranges[] = {
>> + { /* CTRL, TYPER, IIDR */
>> + .base = 0,
>> + .len = 12,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_misc,
>> + },
>> + { /* IGROUPRn */
>> + .base = 0x80,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS / 8,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_raz_wi,
>> + },
>> + { /* ISENABLERn */
>> + .base = 0x100,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS / 8,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_set_enable_reg,
>> + },
>> + { /* ICENABLERn */
>> + .base = 0x180,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS / 8,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_clear_enable_reg,
>> + },
>> + { /* ISPENDRn */
>> + .base = 0x200,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS / 8,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_set_pending_reg,
>> + },
>> + { /* ICPENDRn */
>> + .base = 0x280,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS / 8,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_clear_pending_reg,
>> + },
>> + { /* ISACTIVERn */
>> + .base = 0x300,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS / 8,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_raz_wi,
>> + },
>> + { /* ICACTIVERn */
>> + .base = 0x380,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS / 8,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_raz_wi,
>> + },
>> + { /* IPRIORITYRn */
>> + .base = 0x400,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_priority_reg,
>> + },
>> + { /* ITARGETSRn */
>> + .base = 0x800,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_target_reg,
>> + },
>> + { /* ICFGRn */
>> + .base = 0xC00,
>> + .len = VGIC_NR_IRQS / 4,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_cfg_reg,
>> + },
>> + { /* SGIRn */
>> + .base = 0xF00,
>> + .len = 4,
>> + .handle_mmio = handle_mmio_sgi_reg,
>> + },
>
> Why not #define the offset values for the base fields instead of commenting
> the literals?
I've had a separate discussion with RobH about that, and this is the
pipe for the GIC move into drivers.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
