Il 30/10/2012 19:21, Jan Kiszka ha scritto: > > > Aren't we still dependent on the order of processing? If the APIC is > > > restored after the device, won't we get the same problem? > > > > Strictly speaking yes, but CPUs and APICs are always the first devices > > to be saved. > Hmm, thinking about this again: Why is the MSI event injected at all > during restore, specifically while the device models are in transitional > state. Can you explain this? Because the (virtio-serial) port was connected on the source and disconnected on the destination, or vice versa. In my simplified reproducer, I'm really using different command-lines on the source and destination, but it is not necessary. For example, if you have a socket backend, the destination will usually be disconnected at the time the machine loads. One alternative fix is a vm_clock timer that expires immediately. It would fix both MSI and INTx, on the other hand I thought it was an APIC bug because the QEMU APIC works nicely. > Does the same pattern then also apply on INTx injection? Yes. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
