Re: [patch 02/16] x86: pvclock: make sure rdtsc doesnt speculate out of region

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 06:56:11PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:49:51PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > On 11/01/2012 03:48 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:46:58PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >> Originally from Jeremy Fitzhardinge.
> > >>
> > >> pvclock_get_time_values, which contains the memory barriers
> > >> will be removed by next patch.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>
> > >> Index: vsyscall/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
> > >> ===================================================================
> > >> --- vsyscall.orig/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
> > >> +++ vsyscall/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
> > >> @@ -97,10 +97,10 @@ cycle_t pvclock_clocksource_read(struct 
> > >>  
> > >>  	do {
> > >>  		version = pvclock_get_time_values(&shadow, src);
> > >> -		barrier();
> > >> +		rdtsc_barrier();
> > >>  		offset = pvclock_get_nsec_offset(&shadow);
> > >>  		ret = shadow.system_timestamp + offset;
> > >> -		barrier();
> > >> +		rdtsc_barrier();
> > >>  	} while (version != src->version);
> > >>  
> > >>  	if ((valid_flags & PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT) &&
> > >>
> > > On a guest without SSE2 rdtsc_barrier() will be nop while rmb() will
> > > be "lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)". I doubt pvclock will work correctly either
> > > way though.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > 			Gleb.
> > > 
> > Actually it shouldn't matter for KVM, since the page is only updated by
> > the vcpu, and the guest is never running while it happens. If Jeremy is
> > fine with this, so should I.
> 
> 17.13 TIME-STAMP COUNTER
> 
> "The RDTSC instruction is not serializing or ordered with other
> instructions. It does not necessarily wait until all previous
> instructions have been executed before reading the counter. Similarly,
> subsequent instructions may begin execution before the RDTSC instruction
> operation is performed."
> 
> Both instructions are TSC barriers. 
> 
Which both instructions?

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux