On 31.10.2012, at 12:25, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:26:04PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 10/31/2012 12:22 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 31.10.2012, at 02:32, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>>> Hi Avi / Marcelo, >>>>> >>>>> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull. >>>>> >>>>> Headline changes are: >>>>> >>>>> * Fix 440 target >>>>> * Fix uapi conflict >>>> >>>> Can you regenerate against queue branch? (btw i forgot to update fsl_hcalls.h...). >>> >>> Hrm. So which branch am I supposed to base against? Master, next or queue? This one is against next... >> >> next and queue should be compatible (queue = next + a few patches). Are >> there any conflicts when merging against queue? > > There will be, and fsl_hcalls.h needs fixup (better Alexander verify > i did not screw up anything else). I pushed a tree where I merged for-upstream and your queue and hopefully fixed up the whole mess. It's available as for-queue on my github tree. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
