On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:10:18AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > On the plus side, having an exit taken here on each page turns out to >> > be relatively cheap, as the vmexit from the page fault should be >> > faster to process as it is fully handled within the host kernel. >> > >> > Perhaps some combination of both methods is required? I'm not sure :\ >> >> Perhaps some benchmarking is in order :) >> Can you try telling host, potentially MADV_WILL_NEED >> in that case like qemu does, then run your proprietary test >> and see if things work well enough? > > Ping. Had a chance to try that? Not yet. We've been focused on other things recently and probably won't have a chance to return to this for a couple months at best. Sorry :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
