Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] vhost-net: reduce vq polling on tx zerocopy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/29/2012 11:49 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
It seems that to avoid deadlocks it is enough to poll vq before
  we are going to use the last buffer.  This should be faster than
c70aa540c7a9f67add11ad3161096fb95233aa2e.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/vhost/net.c | 12 ++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 8e9de79..3967f82 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -197,8 +197,16 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, int status)
  {
  	struct vhost_ubuf_ref *ubufs = ubuf->ctx;
  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = ubufs->vq;
-
-	vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+	int cnt = atomic_read(&ubufs->kref.refcount);
+
+	/*
+	 * Trigger polling thread if guest stopped submitting new buffers:
+	 * in this case, the refcount after decrement will eventually reach 1
+	 * so here it is 2.
+	 * We also trigger polling periodically after each 16 packets.
+	 */
+	if (cnt <= 2 || !(cnt % 16))

Why 16?  Does it make sense to make it configurable?

-vlad

+		vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
  	/* set len to mark this desc buffers done DMA */
  	vq->heads[ubuf->desc].len = status ?
  		VHOST_DMA_FAILED_LEN : VHOST_DMA_DONE_LEN;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux