On 10/17/2012 06:23 AM, Michael Wolf wrote: > In the case of where you have a system that is running in a > capped or overcommitted environment the user may see steal time > being reported in accounting tools such as top or vmstat. This can > cause confusion for the end user. To ease the confusion this patch set > adds the idea of consigned (expected steal) time. The host will separate > the consigned time from the steal time. The consignment limit passed to the > host will be the amount of steal time expected within a fixed period of > time. Any other steal time accruing during that period will show as the > traditional steal time. > > TODO: > * Change native_clock to take params and not return a value > * Change update_rq_clock_task > > Changes from V1: > * Removed the steal time allowed percentage from the guest > * Moved the separation of consigned (expected steal) and steal time to the > host. > * No longer include a sysctl interface. > You are showing this in the guest somewhere, but tools like top will still not show it. So for quite a while, it achieves nothing. Of course this is a barrier that any new statistic has to go through. So while annoying, this is per-se ultimately not a blocker. What I still fail to see, is how this is useful information to be shown in the guest. Honestly, if I'm in a guest VM or container, any time during which I am not running is time I lost. It doesn't matter if this was expected or not. This still seems to me as a host-side problem, to be solved entirely by tooling. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
