Re: Using taskset , powertop and perf with qemu-kvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/2012 03:38 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:22:22PM +0530, Jaspal wrote:
Hello ,

I wish to run some cpu intensive tasks on a vm , use only one core
specifically #0 of the 6 available ( Xeon 3670 ) and all the while
record basic perf events like cpu-cycles , instructions etc.

I am using taskset to define the cpu-affinity of the qemu process :
taskset -p 0x1 `pgrep qemu` (assuming only 1 vm is running )

pgrep tells you only the pid of the io thread. vcpu runs in a separate
thread.

I can verify that the vm is now running only on core 0 using top.
top also shows that the qemu process is using 99% of it's share of
CPU time ( %CPU column in top ) upon running the tasks in vm.
However what I fail to see is the increase in time spent of the core
0 in the C0 ( active ) state via powertop. It barely manages to
cross 12%. If I run the same tasks ( FFT benchmark ) on the host on
a different core ( say #1 ) and monitor it using powertop again , I
can see that  C0 % for core 1 is above 100% ( 104 ~ 107 )
So why does not the output of top ( qemu is using 99% of it's cpu
time , which is spent on core 0 )  co-relate with powertop ( which
says core 0 is idle for around 88% of time ) ?
Also , powertop reports that core 2 is being used heavily ( 104 % )
and I suspect this is one which is executing the vm operations. But
why ?
There are no other cpu/memory intensive tasks running on the host.

Next , I am using the perf kvm record function to save the stats. If
I use all the 7 core counters available along-with -a option , perf
generates ~2MB/second . Is there a way to save just the raw count of
the events ?
Also , if instead of -a , if I give -C 0 , perf just saves around
0.016MB/s as opposed to 1.894MB/s in case of -a option. If the vm is
indeed using core 0 , then perf should have recorded the events.

On a last note , does perf kvm automatically selects the vm to
profile ( in case multiple vms are running ) on the basis of the
guest.kallsyms and guest.modules files passed to it ?

Thanks ,
Jaspal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
			Gleb.
Thanks. It works using the correct tid.

--
Jaspal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux