On 2012-10-04 16:21, Anthony Liguori wrote: > -no-kvm should be included too. Reminds me that we still need to agree on the final default accel strategy. > > I just ran across a user that was injecting '-no-kvm-irqchip' in their > libvirt XML via a custom attribute. It turned out it was to work around > broken MSI support in their funky guest they were running. It was the > wrong solution to the problem but they were doing it regardless. > > The point is, there are users in the wild using these options. There's > no reason to remove them if they are trivial to maintain (and they are > in their current form). So let's define a consistent policy for them all: - warn on the command line on use - avoid adding them to the help or other user documentation - keep them until we rework the whole command line Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
