On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30 September 2012 01:33, Christoffer Dall
> <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Well, we're still in HYP mode when performing the pop, so the VMID is
>>> pretty much irrelevant. Same for the initial push, actually. As long as
>>> we're sure VTTBR has been updated when we do the exception return, I think
>>> we're safe.
>>>
>> yeah we're safe, but I can't find anywhere that says the ISB is
>> implied from exception handling/hvc, even though I seem to recall
>> having read this, so I put this here not to worry other readers.
>
> "TLB maintenance operations and the memory order model" in section
> B3.10.1 of the ARM ARM says that exception entry forces completion of
> TLB maintenance ops. Section B5.6.3 ("Synchronization of changes to
> system control registers") says that taking an exception synchronizes
> context, so the VTTBR update is guaranteed to have happened.
>
thanks - I was counting on your help here :)
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
