Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:59:00 +0200 > Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Juan Quintela <quintela@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Hi >> > >> > This are this week minutes: >> > >> > - URI parsing library for glusterfs: libxml2 vs. in-tree "fork" of the >> > same code. (Paolo) >> > * code hasn't changed in 2 years, it is really stable >> > * anthony wants to copy the code >> > >> > - there are several commands that do blocking IO >> > dump-guest-memory/screen-dump >> > convert to asynchronous commands after we move all to QAPI >> > only two commands missingto port to QAPI, and one is posted on list >> > non-blocking IO to a file is a challenge >> > (we have code on the block layer for it) >> > >> > - how to give errors from OpenFile to the caller >> > putting errno as int: bad idea >> > putting as strerrno string: also a bad idea, no warantees >> >> Use the identifiers instead of their non-portable numeric encodings or >> strerror() descriptions: "EPERM", "EINVAL", ... > > Yes, but for me the important point in this discussion is whether > or not a new class is necessary. I think it it isn't. If we have a tool that needs to differientiate errors, chances are another user needs to also. Regards, Anthony Liguori -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
