Re: [PATCH 0/9] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/21/2012 06:46 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
Hi Andrew,

Richard Davies and Shaohua Li have both reported lock contention
problems in compaction on the zone and LRU locks as well as
significant amounts of time being spent in compaction. This series
aims to reduce lock contention and scanning rates to reduce that CPU
usage. Richard reported at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/21/91 that
this series made a big different to a problem he reported in August
(http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=134511507015614&w=2).

One way or the other, this series has a large impact on the amount of
scanning compaction does when there is a storm of THP allocations.

Andrew,

Mel and I have discussed the stuff in this series quite a bit,
and I am convinced this is the way forward with compaction.

--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux