On 09/16/2012 01:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2012-09-13 12:33, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> >> >> >> So, this can be the foundation for direct MSI delivery as well, right? >> >> >> > What do you mean by "direct MSI delivery"? kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic() is >> > called by MSI. If you mean delivery from irq context, then yes, mst >> > plans to do so. >> >> Yes, that's what I was aiming at. >> >> Jan > > Avi, I've been debating with self whether it's still worth it > to bounce interrupts that don't get optimized such as > broadcasts, out to thread? Maybe we can just do direct delivery > unconditionally? Guests don't seem to use broadcasts at all widely ... Malicious guests do, all the time. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
