Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] pc: refactor compat code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:31:24PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:23:18PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:20:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > In preparation to adding PV EOI migration for 1.2,
> > > trivially refactor some some compat code
> > > to make it easier to add version specific
> > > cpuid tweaks.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  hw/pc_piix.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Why can't you clear the cpuid bit in kvm paravirt leaf at hw/pc_piix.c, 
> > leaving compat code isolated there?
> 
> This is not how we handle it for compat properties:
> there we set flag in pc_piix and make devices look at
> that flag.
> And it makes sense because what you suggest does not scale: we can not
> teach pc_piix about quirks of all hardware.

What is there to scale? Old machines are static, they don't change. This
way you are putting the burden of compat support in the generic driver
code, which has better things to worry about than old machine types.

IMO it is better to have all of the compat mess localized.

> It will also scale better if we ever get interested about
> compatibility and migration for non pc machines.
> -- 
> MST

Alright, will wait a couple of days before merging.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux