Am 28.08.2012 16:27, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:55:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 28 August 2012 14:30, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> - 1.2 branching, or creation of a "cpu-next" tree where "good to be >>> merged" patches can live until 1.2 is done; >> >> With 1.3 due for release in just over a week, it seems unlikely >> that it's worth branching at this point... > > Well, the closer to the release, the smaller the cost of branching as we > won't have many patches entering the 1.2 branch, anyway. The idea behind the new release model is to never branch for releases, so that we can easily bisect between v1.2 and v1.3, both tags being on the same branch. So I don't think a 1.2 branch is likely. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
