Re: [regression] virtio net locks up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/12/2012 01:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:08:31PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> On 07/30/2012 07:33 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>>> Hello Stefan,
>>>
>>> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Bernd Schubert
>>>> <bernd.schubert <at> itwm.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>>>>> On 01/11/2012 05:04 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>>>> Try pinging the host's IP address from inside the guest.  Run tcpdump
>>>>>> on the guest's tap interface from the host and observe whether or not
>>>>>> you see any packets being sent from the guest.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> sorry for my terribly late reply. As usual I got distracted by too many other
>>> things and then returned the hardware I was running the VMs on. My new desktop
>>> system is better suitable to run kvm and I can easily reproduce it now with 3.5
>>> on host and guest side. So its not fixed in recent versions yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems arp requests are still going out, but then don't go in:
>>>>>
>>>>> 17:16:21.202547 ARP, Reply 192.168.123.1 is-at 00:25:90:38:09:cd (oui
>>>>> Unknown), length 28
>>>>> 17:16:21.538724 ARP, Request who-has squeeze1 tell squeeze3, length 28
>>>>> 17:16:21.539026 ARP, Reply squeeze1 is-at 52:54:00:12:34:11 (oui Unknown),
>>>>> length 28
>>>>> 17:16:22.200912 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.123.1 tell squeeze3, length 28
>>>>
>>>> Okay, so it seems networking from the tap device and beyond is fine.
>>>>
>>>>>> rmmod virtio_net inside the guest and then modprobe virtio_net again.
>>>>>> See if network connectivity is restored (remember to rerun DHCP or
>>>>>> whatever, if necessary).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, that makes it work again. But probably is not the real solution ;)
>>>>
>>>> It's just another piece of information which helps debug this :).  At
>>>> least nothing has wedged itself into an unrecoverable state.
>>>>
>>>> When you said the problem happens without vhost, did you explicitly
>>>> run vhost=off?  Or did you just omit "vhost=on"?
>>>
>>> It was definitely off and I can confirm that it also locks up with vhost=on and
>>> vhost=off with 3.5.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This sounds like a guest kernel/driver issue.  I recommend testing
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git in
>>>> the guest to see if this has already been fixed.
>>>>
>>>> If you have the -dbg RPMs installed it may be possible to insert a
>>>> probe into the virtio_net kernel module and observe receive
>>>> interrupts.  This does require the right kernel CONFIG_ but you might
>>>> already have it enabled:
>>>>
>>>> $ sudo perf probe --add skb_recv_done
>>>> $ sudo perf record -e probe:skb_recv_done -a
>>>> ...send some packets to the guest...
>>>> ^C
>>>> $ sudo perf script
>>>>
>>>> If you see no skb_recv_done events then the guest driver is not
>>>> receiving a notification when packets are received.
>>>>
>>>> You can find more about how to use perf-probe(1) at
>>>> http://blog.vmsplice.net/2011/03/how-to-use-perf-probe.html.
>>>
>>> Ah nice, I would have used systemtap, but always wanted to check how to do it
>>> with perf :)
>>>
>>> So once the virtio NIC has locked up, I don't get any events from it anymore -
>>> until I remove/re-insert the virtio module (including ifup/ifdown). I will try
>>> to find some time later on this week to look into it again.
>>> Any further ideas how to proceed (I haven't even checked yet how virtio works at
>>> all...).
>>
>>
>> I took a quick glance where skb_recv_done is registered at all and
>> traced it back to vp_find_vqs(). Looking into that function I
>> noticed MSI and so tried to boot with pci=nomsi. And indeed I
>> guessed it right, with pci=nomsi I don't get any lockups anymore.
>> Am I the only one booting kvm-qemu usually with enabled MSI?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernd
> 
> No :)
> 
> I am guessing it has to do with OOM handling in the guest -
> it is tested very little but maybe your guest is such that atomic
> pool gets exhausted for some reason.
> Could you pls check whether refill_work runs by tracing it?
> This is our OOM handler.
> 
> 

Just checked it, it does not show up in perf script output.


Cheers,
Bernd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux