On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:54:04PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/16/2012 07:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:39:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 08/16/2012 07:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> > >> >> What if a level irqfd shares a line with a KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl? Then an > >> >> EOI can de-assert the irqfd source, but the line is kept high by the > >> >> last KVM_IRQ_LINE invocation. > >> > > >> > Exactly. So 1 ID for userspace and 1 for irqfd. > >> > >> Gaa, this mess belongs in userspace. > > > > Not sure I understand what you refer to. > > > > I meant simply > > #define KVM_IRQFD_IRQ_SOURCE_ID 1 > > request it at kvm init. > > > > As opposed to using KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID like we do now > > for edge. > > Does this seem acceptable to you? > > I meant the pic/ioapic, not this particular bit. :) > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
