Re: [PATCH 0/8] use jump labels to streamline common APIC configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-08-14 16:04, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 05:00 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> 
>>>> The host can prevent this by leaving disabling the guest pmu.  But
>>>> disabling jump labels for real-time kernels may be acceptable too.  We
>>>> can probably to it at run time by forcing the slow path at all times.
>>> Yes, it is possible to add module option that will force slow path if
>>> needed.
>>
>> Should I write a patch or will you? Having host-side stop_machine due to
>> such common guest operations is indeed a no-go for RT.
>>
> 
> Note that an additional patch is needed for perf, otherwise the guest
> (or a user, but that's less of a concern for realtime) can easily invoke
> stop_machine by configuring and unconfiguring its pmu.

Hmm, can't the PMU be blocked by taking away some CPU features?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux