kvm device assignment and MSI-X masking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alex,

you once wrote this comment in device-assignment.c, msix_mmio_write:

    if (!msix_masked(&orig) && msix_masked(entry)) {
        /*
         * Vector masked, disable it
         *
         * XXX It's not clear if we can or should actually attempt
         * to mask or disable the interrupt.  KVM doesn't have
         * support for pending bits and kvm_assign_set_msix_entry
         * doesn't modify the device hardware mask.  Interrupts
         * while masked are simply not injected to the guest, so
         * are lost.  Can we get away with always injecting an
         * interrupt on unmask?
         */

I'm wondering what made you think that we won't inject if the vector is
masked like this (ie. in the shadow MSI-X table). Can you recall the
details?

I'm trying to refactor this code to make the KVM interface a bit more
encapsulating the kernel interface details, not fixing anything. Still,
I would also like to avoid introducing regressions.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux