On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8 August 2012 20:16, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:00:59 +0000 >>> Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Please use more descriptive names instead of acronyms, for example SubChStatus. >>> >>> I'd rather leave these at the well-known scsw, pmcw, etc. names. These >>> have been around for decades, and somebody familiar with channel I/O >>> will instantly know what a struct scsw is, but will need to look hard >>> at the code to figure out the meaning of SubChStatus. >> >> If they are well-known and have been around for so long time, are >> there any suitable header files (with compatible licenses) where they >> are defined which could be reused? >> >> Otherwise, please follow CODING_STYLE. > > I think we should follow CODING_STYLE for capitalisation issues > but generally if the device's documentation has standard abbreviations > for register names, structures, etc, etc we should use them. Often > this code has to be maintained later by somebody else who might not > be familiar with the general operation of the hardware and who is trying > to match up the code with whatever the data sheet says. Following the > naming used in the h/w docs makes that job easier. Yes. typedef struct SCSW {} SCSW; should be OK too. > > (for instance I took the opportunity of making a bunch of structure > member names in target-arm line up with the ARM ARM names > as part of the refactoring that went on a while back.) > > -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html