Re: [PATCH 03/15] qom: introduce reclaimer to release obj

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/08/2012 12:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 08/08/2012 11:05, Avi Kivity ha scritto:
>>> > From: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > 
>>> > Collect unused object and release them at caller demand.
>>> > 
>> Please explain the motivation for this patch.
> 
> It's poor man RCU, I think?

I thought that it was to defer destructors (finalizers) to a more
suitable context.  But why is the unref context unsuitable?

I don't see how it relates to RCU, where is the C and the U?

Anyway the list eagerly awaits the explanation.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux