Re: [PATCH 4/9] KVM: define kvm_bad_pfn statically

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 10:15:27AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> Remind me what is the guarantee that -Exxx does not clash with
> a valid pfn number?

A pfn number is an address >> PAGE_SHIFT, so it will have the top 12
(at least) bits clear, whereas -Exxx will have the top bit set.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux